Objective: In Clause 2, Article 515 of the Civil Procedure Code states that: (losses resulting from the loss of profit is not charged), but must apply the provisions of this clause binds us together and other materials mentioned in the Civil Code requires that we profit to be usurped by the same sponsor usurper addition and non-Exchequer ranging interests as well as many scholars believe. Methodology: But if not usurped by non-profit but to prevent rubbing the owner of vindication of benefits, such as "without being in someone's home to prevent the usurpation of the owner quartered in your home or prevent the businessman at attend to the business, according to this clause losses from non-profit seedlings cannot claim. Results: From what was said, it was the judgment of liability in favor of non-profit manner and thus cutting rationally and if we claim God also talk about liability with reasonably high have not said if the lawyer is a wise revulsion indicates lack of consent but also the legislator's conduct and therefore cannot reasonably be claimed that the legislator so wise in the signed. Conclusion: It is surprising that jewelry to justify the lack of liability in the event of imprisonment businessman and craftsman says (with respect to comparable public jurists and are not allowed to guarantee interests, how our is based on the principles of respect mopping).
