IZOSAYN - GRAPHIC EXPRESSION OF SITUATIONAL PRAGMATIC SYSTEM (SPS)

Authors

  • Toirova Guli Ibragimova University language and literature named after Alisher Navoi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24200/jsshr.vol5iss04pp68-72

Abstract

In article on a methodological basis a lot of aspect systems are considered structure discourse systems, its differences from system-structural (paradigmatic) system and the new concept isosign for a graphic designation of relevant components of speech dialogue as systems of a special kind is entered. Methodology: In the artistic image isolated and developed proposals for the following image situational pragmatic system (SPS) methods Results: Due to the fact that literature reflects life as the process of speech communication, especially its prologue is reflected in it. The disclosure of the prologue the author gives his interpretation of some facts peculiar to the communicants. On the basis of the speech of one device opens properties of speech of the second device. Conclusion: Ten of these methods can be applied in this direction. In many cases, the use of - or method is usually considered the specificity of the creative method of the author. Therefore, the form of presentation of artistic images verbal communication (VC) can be divided into 8 types.

References

Abdullah Zadeh, B. 2007. Comparing personality factors, the style of problem solving and stress levels experienced in normal and addicts, thesis, University of Tabriz.

Jomepoor, H. 2002. The role of religious beliefs in mental health, Monthly Education, Ministry of Education, April 81.

Kermani, Z. 2011. Snyder Hope Scale psychometric properties. Journal of Applied Psychology, 3 (19). 7-23.

Lopez, S. J., Snyder, C. R., Magyar-Moe, J. L., Edwards, L. M., Pedrotti, J. T., Janowski, K., ... & Pressgrove, C. 2004. Strategies for Accentuating Hope. Positive Psychology in Practice. 388-404.

McCrae, R. R., & Costa Jr, P. T. 2004. A contemplated revision of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory. Personality and individual differences, 36(3), 587-596.

Mueller, P. S., Plevak, D. J., & Rummans T. A. 2001. Religious Involvement, Spirituality, and Medicine: Implications for Clinical Practice. Mayo Clin Proc. 76(12), 1225-1235.

Osman, J. D., & Russell, R. D. 1979. The spiritual aspects of health. Journal of School Health, 49(6), 359-359.

Snyder, C. R. (Ed.). 2000. Handbook of hope: Theory, measures, and applications. Academic press.

Snyder, C. R. 1995. Conceptualizing, measuring, and nurturing hope. Journal of Counseling & Development, 73(3), 355-360.

Snyder, C. R., Irving, L. M., & Anderson, J. R. 1991. Hope and health. Handbook of social and clinical psychology: The health perspective, 162, 285-305.

Tversky, A., & Griffin, D. 1991. Endowment and contrast in judgments of well-being', in (F. Strack, M. Argyle and N. Schwarz, eds.), Subjective Well-Being: An Interdisciplinary Perspective.

Vader, J. P. 2006. Spiritual Health: The Next Frontier. Eur J Public Health, 16(5), 475-475.

Downloads

Published

2019-08-16

Issue

Section

Articles