Verbal Combat Strategies in William Shakespeare's Othello: Othello versus Iago
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24200/jsshr.vol5iss03pp8-12Abstract
Writers argue that Cultural Materialism is an "umbrella term" that allows itself the opulence to use a wide range of instruments and theories from many different disciplines and interdisciplinaries in the superstructure. This also allows us to justify the nature of both commonly acknowledged and abstruse socio-cultural episteme and discourse, one of the most prominent of which is the subject matter of power and power relations. Methodology: This study, which was originally part of a larger body of work on Cultural Materialism, attempts to draw upon a few different theories to scrutinize the confrontational relationship that exists between the two prominent characters of Shakespeare's Othello (namely Othello and Iago), as represented by the duel-like direct and indirect orations and actions of the two characters. The main purpose of the article is to show how Iago is able to control the words of Othello against him and thus succeed in manipulating other characters. Results: The critical and theoretical debates are drawn upon in this paper will include Austin's attitudes on language as action, Bourdieu's argument of dialogue as contest and Hutchby's findings on turn-taking strategies. Conclusion: This study will also utilize some theories of Michel Foucault such as discourse, language, power and power relations in order to have some influence in relation to individuals' ideas.References
Austin, J. L. 1999. How to do things with words. In The Discourse Reader, edited by Jaworski and Coupland, London and New York: Routledge, 63–75.
Bourdieu, P. 1999. Language and symbolic power. Translated by Gino Raymond and Matthew Adamson. In The Discourse Reader, edited by Jaworski and Coupland, London and New York: Routledge, 502–513.
Burns, E. 1994. Michael Foucault. Trans. Babak Ahmadi. Tehran: Kahkeshan.
Fairclough, N. 1989. Language and Power. London: Longman.
Foucault, M. 1980. Power and Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, ed. Colin Gordon, London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Foucault, M. 1990. The History of Sexuality, An Introduction, ed. Vintage/Random House.
Gavhale, S. R. 2016. INEQUALITY OF GENDER RATIO AMONG RELIGIOUS AND SOCIAL GROUPS IN INDIA. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 4(2), 68-75. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2016.422
Hutchby, I. 1999. Power in discourse: The case of arguments on a British talk radio show. In The Discourse Reader, edited by Jaworski and Coupland, London and New York: Routledge, 481–489.
Kershner, B. 2001. Mikhail Bakhtin and Bakhtinian criticism. Notes towards a reading of A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man. In Introducing Literary Theories: A Guide and Glossary, edited by Wolfreys, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 19–31.
Nietzsche, F. W. 1998. The Will to Power. Trans. Rowya Monajjem. Tehran: Mes.
Shakespeare, W. 1953. Othello. London: Macmillan.
Ziaee Parwar, H. 2004. War, the Cultural Institute of International Studies. Abrar International Institute for Contemporary Cultural Studies. Tehran.
