Comparison Metacognitive beliefs and Control Strategies of Thought and Document Styles among Diabetes and Healthy People
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24200/jsshr.vol4iss01pp59-63Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare Metacognitive beliefs and control strategies of thought and document styles in between diabetics and healthy. Methodology: The study population consisted of all patients admitted to hospitals and specialized clinics of Ardabil in the first half of 2015. The research method is causal-comparative and be available for sampling. To collect the data, a documentary style (ASQ), a questionnaire metacognition (MCQ) and thought control questionnaire was used in this study. Manoa test was used to examine the research hypotheses. Results: The findings of this study showed that among the components of Metacognitive beliefs between the two groups of patients with diabetes and normal subjects there is a significant difference (P>0.05) and the mean scores of positive beliefs about worry, uncontrollability and danger, cognitive confidence and the need to control thoughts samples from diabetic group than in normal group and only in the cognitive self-consciousness, there is no difference between the two groups. Conclusion: It can be concluded that due to the need to educate people with diabetes to increase their metacognitive beliefs.References
Atash Pour, H. & Noorbakhsh, M. 2010. Organizations performance evaluation by balanced scores sample, Foolad journal,2. 6-18.
Chavan, M. 2009. The balanced scorecard a new challenge, Journal of management development, 28(5). 393-406.
Christsen, D. 2008. The impact of Balanced Scorecard usage on organization performance, PhD Dissertation.
Amir, N., Cashman, L. & Foa, E.B. 1997. Strategies of thought control in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Behav Res Ther, 35:775-77.
Behrad, B. & Kamali, M. 2010. Relationship Strategies "thought control" with eating disorders in female students in Yazd. Zahedan Medical Journal, 13 (7).
Flavell, J. H. 1979. Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American psychologist, 34(10), 906.
Hanich, L.B., Jordan, N.C., Kaplan, D., & Dick, J. 2001. Performance across different areas of mathematical cognition in children with learning difficulties. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(3). 615-626.
McFarlane, P., Gilbert, R. E., MacCallum, L. & Senior, P. 2013. Chronic Kidney Disease in Diabetes. Canadian Journal of Diabetes 37: 129–136.
Peterson, C., & Barrett, L. 1987. Explanatory style and academic performance among university freshmen. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 603-607.
Peterson, C., & Park, C. 1998. Learned helplessness and explanatory style. Advanced Personality, 287-308, New York: Plenum.
Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. 1984. Causal explanations as a risk factor for depression. Psychology Review, 91, 347-374.
Rajabi, G.R. & Shahni Yeillagh, M. 2005. The effects of gender and field of study documents the styles and results of psychometric scale high school students in Ahwaz. Shiraz University Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 22 (45).
Reynolds, M., & Wells, A. 1999. The Thought Control Questionnaire: psychometric Properties in a clinical sample, and relationship with PTSD and depression. Psychological Medicine, 29, 1089–1099.
Weiner, B. 1985. An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548-573.
Winner, L. 2010. The whale and the reactor: A search for limits in an age of high technology. University of Chicago Press.
