The Relationship Between Supervision and Teachers’ Teaching Experience and its Influence on Their Classroom Decision Making in EFL Classes

Authors

  • Kaivan Parhoodeh Islamic Azad University Gillan-e-Gharb center
  • Shariar Jalili Islamic Azad University Islam Abad Branch

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24200/jsshr.vol2iss03pp51-61

Abstract

This study was an attempt to explore the relationship between supervision and teachers’ teaching experience in the Iranian EFL teachers and its influence on their classroom decision making. Methodology: 74 male and female English teachers holding BA, MA, or PhD degrees participated in this survey. Classroom observation and a teachers’ questionnaire were used for the purpose of the study. The findings reveal that among the less experienced teachers those who had less than five years of teaching experience were found to be more influenced by the supervision process when it came to making decisions in the classroom. Results: These teachers indicated the importance of supervision for their classroom improvement and their teaching skills. Teachers with six to ten years of teaching experience appeared to be the most pessimists amongst others. In addition, from the results of the qualitative analysis it can be concluded that the supervision program obviously failed to function for those teachers who had 16 years of teaching experience and more as well. Conclusion: In this case, the program seemed to be only a paperwork job. 

References

Acheson, K. A., & Gall, M. D. 1997. Techniques in the clinical supervision of teachers: Preservice and inservice applications (4th Ed.). New York: Longman.

Cogan, M. L. 1973. Clinical supervision. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Fraser, K. 1980. Supervisory behaviour and teacher satisfaction. Journal of Education Administration, 18(2), 224-227.

Glanz, J. 2006. What every principal should know about instructional leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Glickman, C. D. 1990. Supervision of instruction: A development approach. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Glickman, C. D., Gordon, S. P., & Ross-Gordon, J. M. 2001. Supervision and instructional leadership (5th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Gordon, S. P. 1990. Developmental Supervision: An Exploratory Study of a Promising Model. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 5(4), 293-307.

Kayaoglu, M. N. 2012. Dictating or Facilitating: The Supervisory Process for Language Teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(10), 103-117.

Kimbrough, R. B., & Burkett, C. W. 1990. The principalship: Concepts and practices. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Neagley, R.L. & Evans, D.N. 1964. Handbook for effective supervision of instruction. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Stimpson, P., Lopez-Real, F., Bunton, D., Chan Wal-Keung, D., Sivan, A. & Williams, M. 2000. Better Supervision, Better Teaching: A Handbook for Teaching Practice Supervisors. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

White, B. L. & Daniel, L. G. 1996. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the mid-south educational resource center. (Report No. ED 403 641). Tuscaloosa, AL. Nov. 6-8.

Downloads

Published

2019-07-23

Issue

Section

Articles