Management accunting its constraints

Authors

  • Abbas Ghodrati Zoeram Islamic Azad University, Neishabour Brach.
  • Vali Ansari Islamic Azad University, Neishabour Brach.
  • Khalil Dehghan Islamic Azad University, Neishabour Brach.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24200/jmas.vol3iss02pp110-113

Abstract

The organizational transformation that happened in the world economy recent decade was accompanied by the concepts of less-profitable production and flexible system. The concepts implicitly provide a production and working capacity that is consistent with demand and current capacity of acceptance. The origin of limited management was higher according to efficiency and imbalance between resources and demand for the resources. There are double restrictions for the private institutions and in all Irish economic fields. Methodology: The international institutions face with the global limitations about less-profitable productive models. The non-commercial institutes are facing new problems that are related to the lack of employees and other resources while there were a recession and low efficiency about resources. Goldratt in her book providing theories about constrains provides new fields in economic perspective (Goldratt and Cooks, 1993). These managing ideas of best salesman are describing as an exciting story that describes the manager’s attempts to prevent the loss caused by performance and the bankruptcy of the company. Results: In the story, Goldratt and Descooks attacked to the price finished accounting as an “enemy to productivity” rather than using developed holistic techniques as on-time production and statistic control of the process. In this article, the relative usefulness of the theory of constraints related to accounting business managing methods is explained to use the resources and decision-making. Conclusion: The article, also examines the spread and evaluation of constrains and reactions that cause accounting and managing culture. Survival of the price finished management that is explaining against the continuous attacks is consistent with the probabilities by Goldratt relating to regulations ability to make changes and obligatory developments as training programs.

References

Atwater, B. & Gagne M. 1997. 'The Theory of Constraints versus Contribution Margin Analysis for Product Mix Decisions', Journal of Cost Management, January-February, 6-15.

Balderstone, S. & Keef S. 1999. 'Throughput Accounting: exploding an urban myth', Management Accounting (CIMA), October, 26-27. 3.

Blackstone, J. .2001. ‘Theory of Constraints – a Status Report’. International Journal of Production Research, 39(6): 1053-1080.

Brausch, J. & Taylor T. 1997. 'Who is accounting for the Cost of Capacity', Management Accounting (USA), February, 44-50.

Clarke, P. 1992. 'Management Accounting Practices and Techniques in Irish Manufacturing Firms: a Pilot Study'. The Irish Accounting and Finance Association Proceedings, 17-34.

Cooper R. & Kaplan R. 1992. 'Activity -Based Systems: Measuring the Costs of Resource Usage'.Accounting Horizons 6(3): 1-13.

Dugdale, T. & Jones, D. 1998. 'Throughput Accounting: Transforming Practices?', British Accounting Review 30: 203-220.

Goldratt, E. & Cox, J. 1993. 'The Goal', second edition. Gower.

Horngren, C., Bhimani, A., Foster, G., & Datar, S. 1999. 'Management and Cost Accounting'. Prentice Hall Europe.

Luebbe, R., & Finch, B. 1992. Theory of constraints and linear programming: a comparison. International Journal of Production Research, 30: 1471-1478.

Pickering, A. 1992. Science as Practice and Culture. The University of Chicago Press. Chicago and London.

Pierce, B., & O’Dea, T. 1998. ‘An empirical study of management accounting practices in Ireland’. The Irish Accounting Review, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp.35-65.

Tollington, T. 1998. 'ABC v TOC same cloth as absorption v marginal, different style and cut?',Management Accounting (CIMA), April 44-45.

Umble, M. & Srikanth, M. 1997. Synchronous Management: Profit Based Manufacturing forthe 21st Century, Vols I and II, Spectrum, Guilford, CT

Umble, M., Umble, E. & Murkami, S. 2006. “Implementing theory of constraints in atraditional Japanese manufacturing environment: the case of Hitachi tool engineering”,IJPR, 44 (10): 1863-80.

Downloads

Published

2015-04-01

Issue

Section

Articles