The Effect of Corporate Governance and Profit Management on Cost Stickiness in Listed Firms in Tehran Securities and Stock Exchange

Authors

  • Hosein Nazari

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24200/jmas.vol5iss02pp42-45

Abstract

Good profit management increase and corporate governance reduce costs. Therefore, it seems reasonable to study their reciprocal and individual effects. Thus, this article tries to study the individual and reciprocal relationships of corporate governance and profit management on cost stickiness. Librarian method is used in this article to collect the needed data for research background and theoretical bases.Methodology: Thus, the needed data was collected by studying journals, books, and specialized websites. The needed data was collected from financial statements of the listed firms in Tehran Stock Exchange and website of Islamic studies and development research management. Statistical population of this research is all listed firms in Tehran stock Exchange since the spring of 2011 to the winter of 2017 for about 5 years. Results: This is 1056 firms whose sample volume was determined 200 by Cochran formula. Pearson inferential statistics and multivariate regression methods were used to analyze data. Conclusion: Results showed that profit management increase and corporate governance reduces cost stickiness. 

References

Asiedu, Y., & Gu, P. 1998. Product life cycle cost analysis: state of the art review. International journal of production research, 36(4), 883-908.

Charoenrook, A., &Daouk, H. 2009. A study of market-wide short-selling restrictions (No. 642-2016-44312).

Chen, C. X., Lu, H., &Sougiannis, T. 2012. The agency problem, corporate governance, and the asymmetrical behavior of selling, general, and administrative costs. Contemporary Accounting Research, 29(1), 252-282.

Dierynck, B., & Renders, A. 2015, September. An Empirical Test of the Effect of Outrage Costs on CEO Compensation Level. AAA.

Guo, J., Huang, P., Zhang, Y., & Zhou, N. 2015. Foreign ownership and real earnings management: Evidence from Japan. Journal of International Accounting Research, 14(2), 185-213.

Harris, P. 2012. The profit planning framework: applying marginal accounting techniques to hospitality services. In Accounting and Financial Management (pp. 156-169). Routledge.

Hinterhuber, A. 2004. Towards value-based pricing—An integrative framework for decision making. Industrial Marketing Management, 33(8), 765-778.

Jalilian, M., &Elyssai, E. V. 2014. Review and analyzing the factors affecting the stickiness behavior of general administration costs and sales of listed companies in Tehran Stock Exchange. Applied mathematics in Engineering, Management and Technology, 2(4), 584-596.

Jensen, M. C., &Meckling, W. H. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of financial economics, 3(4), 305-360.

Kama, I., & Weiss, D. 2013. Do earnings targets and managerial incentives affect sticky costs?. Journal of Accounting Research, 51(1), 201-224.

Kaplan, R. S., & Atkinson, A. A. 2015. Advanced management accounting. PHI Learning.

Reed, A. V. 2002. Costly short-selling and stock price adjustment to earnings announcements (Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania).

Downloads

Published

2019-08-10

Issue

Section

Articles