Evaluation of transparency in the conduct of affairs, administrative and financial control and supervision of the staff Brfsad
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24200/jmas.vol5iss01pp61-65Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate organizational factors affecting administrative-financial Brfsad at the level of administrative staff. The aim of this study from the perspective of applied and how to obtain field data, as well as the study of data correlation. Methodology:The population of this study includes all offices and agencies of the country. The random statistical sample size was estimated using the number 321 362 Table Jersey Morgan were gathered. It is also a random cluster sampling. Using the questionnaire used in the research literature review and questionnaire huge et al (1390) has been designed. Results:Its reliability by using Cronbach's alpha coefficient was approved and its validity was confirmed by content. Data collected were analysed using SPSS 22 software, Pearson correlation coefficient and multiple regression were used. The results showed that all aspects of the organizational structure of dysfunction, poor organizational culture, and administrative corruption are financial. Conclusion:The lack of transparency in the conduct of affairs (425/0 = r and 0001/0 = p) and weak monitoring and control (321/0 = r and 0001/0 = p) is a significant relationship. The results showed a lack of transparency in the conduct of affairs in anticipation of the largest financial administrative corruption.References
Abbasi, K., Abdollahi, A., & Saghafi, F. 2008. The role of e-government in reducing corruption in Iran. Fourth International Conference on Information Technology Management and Artbatat. Tehran.
Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. 2010. Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government information quarterly, 27(3), 264-271.
Carlo Bertot, J., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. 2012. Promoting transparency and accountability through ICTs, social media, and collaborative e-government. Transforming government: people, process and policy, 6(1), 78-91.
Cooper, M. C., & Ellram, L. M. 1993. Characteristics of supply chain management and the implications for purchasing and logistics strategy. The international journal of logistics management, 4(2), 13-24.
Delawari, A. 2000. Research Methods in Psychology and Educational Sciences (Tenth Edition).
Ghasemi, V. 2007. Investigate the relationship between procrastination and self-esteem and motivation of students. Journal of Education, 4(14), 151-164.
Huber, G. P. 1991. Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organization science, 2(1), 88-115.
Kahana, N., & Liu Qijun, A. B. 2010. Endemic corruption. European Journal of Political Economy, 26, 82-88.
Khezri, M. 2006. Analysis of institutional corruption. Journal of Strategic Studies, 29.
Nature, B. 2006. Evaluation of risk factors for corruption in order to provide a model to reduce its effects on the development of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Knowledge Management journal, 66.
Ng, D. 2006. The impact of corruption on financial markets. Managerial finance journal, 32(10), 822-836.
Zahedi, Sh., Al-Sadat, M. N., & Shahbazy, S. 2010. The effective factors in reducing corruption (Case Study in Tehran). Management of organizational culture journal, 20.
