Investigation of impact of public ownership on the quality of benefit in the accepted firms of Tehran’s securities and exchange organization
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24200/jmas.vol5iss01pp7-11Abstract
The quality of benefit depends on being useful in decision making as being related, reliability, comparability and stability. According to David Aboudi, quality of benefit, is a part of accounting profit that is sensitive about need and insight of management. Dilot&Tash argue that several factors such as liquidity, accurate measurement and variable estimates are used in evaluating of quality of benefit. This evaluation helps the user’s judgment about trusting to the current income and future perspective.Methodology:Using accounting principles in most of the firms leads to providing reported benefit by a range of quality of benefit instead of specified ridging.Results:It means that the quality of benefit directly is related to cash flow and amount of current estimation of it and subjective benefit will be at least as much as benefit has low estimation or high quality, as a result it will have high quality. In addition, the best quality is obtained when the benefit has the high liquidity and low estimation. It should be noted that all criteria should be considered not only one special criterion.Conclusion:Finally, we can come to the conclusion that investors by putting money into companies with more public ownership will result in more profit.References
Alishah, S., Alibutt, S., Hasan, A. 2009. "Corporate governance and earnings management empirical evidence from Pakistani listed companies", Euro journal of scientific research, Euro journals publishing.
Almaz, T. 2005. Public Policies in the Higher Education of Kazakhstan, SSRN journal, 1: 1-15.
Chen, W., Liu, X., & Yang, Y. 1999. "An empirical study on the signaling effect of dividend policy in Shanghai Stock Market", Chinese Journal of Management Science, (in Chinese), 1: 47-56.
Chen, X., Harfordand, J.,Li, K. 2005. "Monitoring whichinsitituational matter?”University of British Colombia working paper.
Cornett, D. 2007. "Oprating cash from return on assets learning before intrestand taxes plas depreciation divided by total assets", Issuu Publication.
Frankfurter, M., & Wood, B. 2008. "Dividend Policy Theories and Their Empirical Tests", Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 23: 124-136.
HasasYegane, Y., &Puriyanasab, A. 2006. "Entity investors role in the company ownership", accountant journal, 164: 24-41.
He, L., &Liyang, Z. 2005. "Analysis of Cash Dividend Payment between Holders in Chinese Listed Firms", Economic Research Economic Research (in Chinese), 4: 1-25.
Liu, S., & Hu, Y. 2005. "Empirical Analysis of Cash Dividend Payment in Chinese Listed Companies", Jounal of Financial Research, 3: 65-70.
Noroush, I., &EbrahimiKurdler, A. 2005. Investigating and explaining the relationship between stockholders with information symmetry and the usefulness of performance accounting criteria. 12 (4): 97-124.
Saeedi, P.,&Amiri, A. 2008. Investigating the relationship between macroeconomic variables and Tehran Stock Exchange Index. Economic Modelling Quarterly, 2(2): 111-130.
Schooley, D., & Barney, L. 1994. "Using Dividend policy and managerialownership to reduce agency costs", journal of Financial Research, 17: 363-273.
Shoji, I., &Kanehiro, S. 2009. "Optimal Dividedd distribution Policy from the Perspectiv of the impatient and loss-averse investor",Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106: 1039-1061.
Smith, M. 2006. "Sharholderes activism by instituational investors. Evidens from calperes", journal of finance, 51: 225-227.
