Evaluation the Educational Quality Performance of Islamic Azad University, Karaj Branch, Based on Kirkpatrick’s Model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24200/jmas.vol4iss03pp74-78Abstract
There are various models to evaluate educational quality performance of high educational systems in which the Kirkpatrick’s model has been described as comprehensive, simple, and practical model form many educational situations and has been known as a criterion in this field by many specialists. The objective of this research is evaluating educational quality performance in Islamic Azad University, Karaj branch based on Kirkpatrick’s model. Methodology: The methodology of this research is surveying-descriptive and statistical population includes all managers and students of Islamic Azad University, Karaj branch with 34,100 members. Sampling method was stratified random sampling method and 384 members were selected according to population volume based on table randomly. The used instrument was the researcher-made questionnaires, which was designed according to input, output, process, and content sub-scales, then face and content validity was determined by specialized professors, and research reliability was determined 0.75 by Cronbach alpha coefficient. Results: Single-sample statistical t-test to test research hypotheses. In order to test the main question of research based on education quality performance in Islamic Azad University, Karaj branch, it was observed according to the obtained scores from questionnaire and results of t-test that education quality performance situation in Islamic Azad University, Karaj branch, is higher than average (good) level. Conclusion: According to investigate and test the secondary questions, it was observed that education quality performance in Islamic Azad University, Karaj branch has average (good) level. In addition, the input dimension of education quality performance in Islamic Azad University, Karaj branch has average level. The education performance in process and output dimensions was observed in good level.References
Ahmadi, Gh., & Hakimi, S. H. 1996. The problems existing practices evaluated and assessed valuation perspective. Journal of Management in Education, (26).
Amiri Mehr, M. 2006. The effectiveness of corporate training courses in the model of SAIPA Diesel Patrick. MSc thesis, Shahid Beheshti University.
Baazargan, A. 2013. Its quality and evaluation in higher education at the national and international experience. Proceedings of the First Seminar of Higher Education in Iran, (1). Tehran: Allameh Tabatabaei University Press.
Barnes, B. R. 2005. Analyzing Service Quality: The Case of Post-Graduate Chinese Students. Department of Marketing. Leeds University Business School. UK.
Bernardin, H. J. 2003. Human Resource Management: an experiential approach (Third Edition). New York: Mc GrawHill Press.
Hill, Y., Lomas, L., & MacGregor, J. 2003. Students' perceptions of quality in higher education. Quality Assurance Education. 11, 15-20.
Hojati, H., Mehralizadeh, Y., Farhadi, M., Aghamollaei, Gh., & Nobaghi, S. 2013. Evaluate the effectiveness of in-service training of nurses on the model Patrick Case Study: Jurjani Gorgan Hospital. Journal of Nursing Management, 2(3), 35-42.
Ivancevich, J. M. 2007. Human Resource Management. New York: Mc GrawHill.
Karimi, T. 2006. The new models and performance evaluation. Journal Tadbir, 171.
Noe, R. A., Hollenbeck, J. R., Gerhurt, B., & Wright, P. M. 2008. Human Resource Management: gaining Competitive advantage. New York: Mc GrawHill.
Rahimi, Gh. 2006. Performance evaluation and continuous improvement of the organization Journal Tadbir, 173.
Roberts, E., & Pavlak, T. 1996. Municipal government Personnwl Professional and Performance appraisal: Is there a consensus on the characteristics of an effective appraisal system? Journal of Public Personnel Management, 25(3).
Seyf, A. A. 2014. Measurement methods and educational evaluation. Tehran: Publication Doran.
Tavakoli, G. 2010. Evaluation of short courses training students from public libraries of Astan Quds Razavi based on the first level model Kirkpatrick, 2(6), 1-6.
Yar Mohammadian, M. H., & Kalbasi, A. 2006. Internal Evaluation of Deepartments in the School of Management and Medical Informatics. Iranian Journal of Medical Evaluation, 6(1), 123-53. Isfahan University of Medical Sciences.
