Impact of “Innovation” and “Tend to Maturity” on “Tend to Entrepreneurship” in SMEs in Semnan

Authors

  • Mahnaz Eskandarian Payame Noor University
  • Seyed Mohammad Jafari Payame Noor University
  • Hamid Mohammadian Moghani Payame Noor University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24200/jmas.vol4iss02pp21-25

Abstract

This current Research has done to investigate the impact of Innovation and Tend to Maturity on Tend to Entrepreneurship in Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) In Semnan City. The statistical population of this study constitutes of director’s board of SMEs in Semnan City, and number of 140 people has been selected as the sample. Methodology: It has used by questionnaire method for Data gathering. Data was analyzed by using of the SEM model (Structural Equation Model). Questionnaires validity was calculated with Cronbach α. That for questionnaires of Innovation and Tend to maturity on Entrepreneurship, respectively was equal to 0.878 and 0. 846. Results: All Hypotheses was confirmed in level of 0.05 confidence. Conclusion: The results showed that there was significant effect between Innovation and Tend to Maturity on Entrepreneurship.

References

Ahmadpur Dariani, M. 1999. the value of entrepreneurship, a new concept in economic development

Branzei, O., & Vertinsky, I. 2006. Strategic pathways to product innovation capabilities in SMEs. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(1), 75-105.

Davis, S. 2012. Social Entrepreneurship: TOWARDS AN Social Entrepreneurial Culture For Social and Economic Development, International Board Selection Committee, Ashoka: Innovators for the Public, Prepared by request for the Youth Employment Summit, September 7-11.

Edwards-Schachter, M., García-Granero, A., Sánchez-Barrioluengo, M., Quesada-Pineda, H., & Amara, N. 2015. Disentangling competences: Interrelationships on creativity, innovation and entrepreneurship. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 16, 27-39.

Gray, C. 2006. Absorptive capacity, knowledge management and innovation in entrepreneurial small firms. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 12(6), 345-360.

Hills, G. E., Hultman, C. M., & Miles, M. P. 2008. The evolution and development of entrepreneurial marketing. Journal of Small Business Management, 46(1), 99-112.

Jones, O., Cardoso, C. C., & Beckinsale, M. 1997. Mature SMEs and technological innovation: entrepreneurial networks in the United Kingdom and Portugal. International Journal of Innovation Management, 1(03), 201-227.

Madhoushi, M., Sadati, A., Delavari, H., Mehdivand, M., & Mihandost, R. 2011. Entrepreneurial orientation and innovation performance: The mediating role of knowledge management. Asian Journal of Business Management, 3(4), 310-316.

Robbins, S. P. 2000. Managing today!. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Rosenbusch, N., Brinckmann, J., & Bausch, A. 2011. Is innovation always beneficial? A meta-analysis of the relationship between innovation and performance in SMEs. Journal of business Venturing, 26(4), 441-457.

Sexton, D. L., & Bowman-Upton, N. B. 1991. Entrepreneurship: Creativity and growth. New York: Macmillan.

Terziovski, M. 2010. Innovation practice and its performance implications in small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in the manufacturing sector: a resource‐based view. Strategic Management Journal, 31(8), 892-902.

Ulhoi, J.P. 2014. "The social dimensions of entrepreneurship". DK8210 Aarhus V, Denmark Tech-novation.

Downloads

Published

2019-07-20

Issue

Section

Articles