Studying the current status of employee performance evaluation of Jihad Organization University of North Khorasan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24200/jmas.vol3iss03pp37-42Abstract
This study aims to investigate the present situation of performance of Jihad's University employees of North Khorasan and providing ultimate model. This study is descriptive_ applied, the statistical population was 80 people whom all of them were chosen due to small number of people. Methodology: In order to collect the data, the librarian and internet sources such as books were used. Information and data collection needed to assess the research hypothesis, the researcher made questionnaire which has 71 items is used that the experts' opinions have been applied for reliability and the Cronbach’s coefficient test was used to confirm the validity of the questionnaire and the value was 0.90. SPSS software was used to analyse the information. Results: The single sample t-test and factorial analysis and the Freedman test were used in inferential statistics. Conclusion: The results showed that the present situation of Jihad's University has significant difference in regarding employees' ultimate performance and based on the results of the Freedman test and factorial analysis, in employees' opinions, the assessment indicators, use of assessment results, assessment goals, and performance standard are the best components and the assessment period has the least rate.References
Alhaviredi, Habibpour, 1989, Study of performance evaluation of railway employees and to provide suitable development of human resources. Tehran University master's thesis.
Barnabè, F. 2011. A “system dynamics-based Balanced Scorecard” to support strategic decision making: Insights from a case study. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 60(5), 446-473.
Davis, K., & Newstrom, J. W. 1989. Human behavior at work: Organizational behavior. McGraw-Hill.
Dwivedi, P., & Pandey, I., 2013. ROLE OF MEDIA IN SOCIAL AWARENESS. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 1(1), 67-70.
Lucas, R. W. 1994. Performance coaching: Now and for the future. HR Focus, 71 1, 16-28.
Mayer, R. C. & Davis, J. H. 1997. the effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management: A field quasi-experiment. Journal of applied psychology, 84 1, 123-136.
Murphy, K. R. & Cleveland, J. 1995. Understanding Performance Appraisal: Social, Organizational, and Goal-based Perspectives, NJ: SAGE
Murphy, K. R. 2008. Explaining the weak relationship between job performance and ratings of the job performance. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1 2, 148-160.
Ravichandran, S., Gilmore, S. A., & Strohbehn, C. 2007. Organizational citizenship behavior research in hospitality: Current status and future research directions. Journal of Human Resources in Hospitality & Tourism, 62, 59-78.
Simmons, J. 2002. An “expert witness” perspective on performance appraisal in universities and colleges. Employee Relations, 241, 86-100.
Tabarsa, G., Ghafouri, D. & Sabeti, A. 2006. Recent procedures and future progresses in human resourceaccounting. Accounting, 22, 187
Zare. Zainab. 2012. Analysis of the performance evaluation of Al-Zahra University. Azal Press. First Edition.