Assignment of Arbitrator in Domestic Arbitration

Authors

  • Eissa Amini Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University
  • Parvin Davoudi Electronic Branch, Islamic Azad University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24200/jsshr.vol3iss03pp67-74

Abstract

Arbitration is one of the common dispute settlement methods in which the arbitrator is considered the key element. Methodology: In the Iranian law, besides the arbitrary official of appointing arbitrator, there have been envisaged other legal officials in Civil Procedure Code 2000 and some other special laws. Except for the conditions particular to the parties to a dispute and the arbitrator appointment office, the person appointed as an arbitrator is required to have some positively-or-negatively-defined specifications including not being beneficiary. Results: Following the conclusion of the arbitration contract and the appointment of an arbitrator, conforming to the Contracts' Necessity Principal, the provisions of such contract will be binding and irrevocable and the other parties to a dispute will not be able to loge unilaterally an appeal before the courts of justice, unless by mutual consent, the arbitration contract is annulled or cancelled through a legal manner. Conclusion:  meanwhile, the parties to the dispute shall attract the acceptance of their appointed arbitrator(s) and finally the arbitrator's appointment imposes some effects and obligations to the parties to arbitration and the arbitrator themselves, which the both are obliged to observe, otherwise it causes their mutual responsibility. 

References

Bagheri, M., 2008, arbitration of disputes arising from economic rights: the failure of recourse to arbitration in contract disputes, competition law and stock market law, legal research, Faculty of Law and Political Science magazine martyr Beheshti University, No. 48, p. 277.

Ghamami M., & Mohseni, H., 2009, the principles of the diplomatic guaranteed a performance at the hearing and the principles and the characteristics of the civil magistrate, and of political, Tehran University Faculty of Law, No. 74.

Karimi, A., Paartov H.R., 2014, Ch 3, Press Dadgostar, p. 68.

Mnionjr, C. & Mirfakhraei, M.J., 1991, civil liability of judges, comparative study with reform proposals, legal magazine, Office of International Legal Services of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Spring, Winter, No. 14 and 15, page 219 onwards

Mohebbi, M. & Kakavand M., 1960, a collection of essays celebrating the tenth anniversary of the Iran Chamber Arbitration Centre, publications Shahre Danesh, p. 213.

Rafiei, A., 2013 the overall judgment on the rights of Iran, China Publications Fekrsazan, p. 36.

Sarir, F., 2007, regional issues topic of Civil Procedure, published Majd, p. 292.

Shams, A., 2007, civil procedure, vol. 1, publications Derak,, p. 307.

Shams, A., 2013, civil procedure, vol. 3, No 23, published Edrak, p. 530

Shiravi A., 2012, international commercial arbitration, no 1, Publications Office, 2012, 168.

Taghipour B., 2014, responsibilities after the rights of Iran and some countries, Journal of Comparative Legal Studies, Issue 1, Volume Five, spring and summe, p. 64.

The resignation of the judge after he resigned, 1977, The advice of the legal department, set advisory opinion, No. 376, dated 09.04.1977.

Downloads

Published

2019-08-10

Issue

Section

Articles