Terms and causes of divorce in the legal system of Iran and Turkey

Authors

  • Esmat Mokhlesabadi Farahani Shahr-e-Qods branch, Islamic Azad University
  • Alireza Forozandehpour Shahr-e-Qods branch, Islamic Azad University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24200/jsshr.vol3iss03pp32-37

Abstract

In legal systems, the efforts have been focused on protecting marriage for purpose of sustaining family institute. Methodology: However, in cases that there is no way for escaping from divorce, formation of divorce in legal system needs some terms and causes to be specified in Statutes of the relevant system. The present study is aimed in assessing terms and causes of divorce in the mentioned legal systems of Iran and Turkey. Terms and causes of divorce are different in the mentioned legal systems due to the different political system governance in these countries. Results: It could be found from studies in this field that in Iran's legal system, terms and causes of divorce have been regulated in benefit of men due to their wide authorities and powers in this field. However, the Iranian Legislator has taken some measures to limit the authorities. Conclusion: However, in legal system of Turkey, terms and causes of divorce are same for men and women and observe rights of both of them due to being derived from European regulations.

References

Aghajanian, A. 1986. Some notes on divorce in Iran. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 749-755.

Akbari, W. 2008. The Changing Family Patterns among immigrants: An evaluation of the causes of divorces/separation among Iranian families in Sweden.

Beckstrom, J. H. 1973. Transplantation of legal systems: An early report on the reception of western laws in Ethiopia. Am. J. Comp. L., 21, 557.

Darvishpour, M. 2002. Immigrant women challenge the role of men: How the changing power relationship within Iranian families in Sweden intensifies family conflicts after immigration. Journal of comparative family studies, 271-296.

Htun, M., & Weldon, S. L. 2011. State power, religion, and women's rights: A comparative analysis of family law. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 181, 145-165.

Jones, G. W. 1981. Malay marriage and divorce in Peninsular Malaysia: Three decades of change. Population and Development Review, 255-278.

Kandiyoti, D. 1989. Women and Islam: What are the missing terms. Women Living Under Muslim Laws, 5-9.

Keddie, N. R. 2007. Iranian women's status and struggles since 1979. Journal of International Affairs, 17-33.

Kucukcan, T. 2003. State, Islam, and religious liberty in modern Turkey: Reconfiguration of religion in the public sphere. BYU L. Rev., 475.

Mir-Hosseini, Z. 2006. Muslim women’s quest for equality: Between Islamic law and feminism. Critical inquiry, 324, 629-645.

Müftüler-Bac, M. 1999. Turkish women's predicament. In Women's studies international forum (Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 303-315). Pergamon.

Tremayne, S. 2006. Modernity and early marriage in Iran: a view from within. Journal of Middle East Women's Studies, 21, 65-94.

Downloads

Published

2019-08-10

Issue

Section

Articles