Relation Dimension Temperament/Character with Social and Domestic about Patients General Anxiety Disorder

Authors

  • Noura Khoshchingol Islamic Azad University of Ardabil
  • Korosh Sahebnazar Islamic Azad University of Ardabil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24200/jsshr.vol3iss04pp54-57

Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine the relation dimension temperament/character with social and domestic about patients' general anxiety disorder.  Methodology: In this research, correlation method is used. The study population included all patients with general anxiety disorder are referred to health centers in Ardabil in 2012. The sample consisted of 73 patients who were identified and selected by convenience sampling method. To collect the data, anxious thoughts, general anxiety disorder questionnaire, temperament and character questionnaire, social compliance questionnaire were used. The present study data were analyzed with the Pearson correlation coefficient methods. Results: The data analysis showed that there is a significant negative relationship between novelty seeking and harm avoidance of social and family functioning. There is a significant positive relationship between reward dependence, cooperation, confronted with social and family functioning. Conclusion: These results have important applications in the pathology and treatment of patients with general anxiety disorder.

References

Anthony, J. L., Lonigan, C. J., Hooe, E. S., & Phillips, B. M. 2002. An affect-based, hierarchical model of temperament and its relations with internalizing symptomatology. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 31, 480–490.

Cloninger, C. R., Przybeck, T. R., Svrakic, D. M., & Wetzel, R. D. 1994. The temperament and character inventory (TCI): a guide to its development and use. St. Louis, Mo. Center for Psychobiology of Personality, Washington University, 19-28.

Cloninger, C. R. 1987. A systematic method for clinical description and classification of personality variants: A proposal. Archives of general psychiatry, 44(6), 573-588.

Delavar, A. 2008. Theoretical and practical research in the humanities and social growth, Tehran.

Halford, W. K., & Markman, D. J. 2003. Best practice in couple relationship education. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 29, 30-37.

Kaplan, S. 2003. Bihavioral Sciences. clinical psychiatry,17,44-48.

Kawuo, M., Tugade, M., & Fredrickson, B. 2004. Temperamentds and Character in behavior personality From Generalized Anexiety Disorder.Jurnal of Personality and Psychology, 86(2), 320-333.

Khomami, S, Rostami, R, Kazemi, R. & Rahiminezhad, A. 2010. The effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation on the social functioning of patients with treatment-resistant major depressive disorder. Journal of Behavhoral Sciences, 4(4), 299-304.

paphenberger, D. S, & Mcclure, E. B. 2007. General Anxiety Disorder and character: clinical feature. In Text book of psychiatry, Philaddplira, Lippincotl Williams, welkins.

Sanderson, K., Dinardo, L., Rap, A., & Parlo, J. 1995. Positive and negative affectivity and their relation to anxiety and depressive disorders .Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 97, 346-353.

Wells, A., & Carter, K. 2000. Further test of a cognitive model of GAD worry and metacognitions in-patient with GAD, panic disorder, social phobia, and depression. Behavior Therapy (in press), 747-758.

Yogi, S. 2013. ROLE OF MEDIA IN SOCIAL AWARENESS (A Review Study). Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 1(1), 71-73. Retrieved from https://giapjournals.com/index.php/hssr/article/view/hssr1111

Downloads

Published

2019-08-10

Issue

Section

Articles