The Evaluation of Bahman Automotive Companies Group by Balanced Scored Card Approach and Data Envelopment Analysis

Authors

  • A Farkhondehzadeh Islamic Azad university Yasuj
  • H Rakhsha University of Yasuj
  • M Roshanfekr University of Yasuj

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24200/jsshr.vol2iss02pp32-39

Abstract

With a growing level of competition, companies have been looking for tools to develop and increase competitive performance, in the competitive environment, the design of Performance Measurement Systems (PMS) shows it importance to business’ evolution. automotive industry in Iran in recent year and in sanction situation had many problems in their section. Methodology: in this paper we evaluating Bahman industries by BSC and DEA method and recognized problems. Results: According to the results achieved by solving DEA models, the improvement of efficiency and optimized performance of inefficient unit can be programmed by introducing the sample unit to inefficient unit and executive authorities. The appropriate amount of output and input is exactly determined (in the virtual unit). Conclusion: If the units match the amount of output and input with the determined amount, they can achieve the complete efficiency. 

References

Chang, H., Jwo, C. S., Lo, C. H., Tsung, T. T., Kao, M. J., & Lin, H. M. 2005. Rheology of CuO nanoparticle suspension prepared by ASNSS. Rev. Adv. Mater. Sci, 10(2), 128-132.

Frigo, M. L., & Krumwiede, K. R. 2000. The balanced scorecard. Strategic Finance, 81(7), 50.

Hoque, Z., & James, W. 2000. Linking balanced scorecard measures to size and market factors: impact on organizational performance. Journal of management accounting research, 12(1), 1-17.

Ittner, C. D., Larcker, D. F., & Randall, T. 2003. Performance implications of strategic performance measurement in financial services firms. Accounting, organizations and society, 28(7-8), 715-741.

Jusoh, R., & Parnell, J. A. 2008. Competitive strategy and performance measurement in the Malaysian context: An exploratory study. Management decision, 46(1), 5-31.

Kanji, G. K., & e Sá, P. M. 2002. Kanji's business scorecard. Total quality management, 13(1), 13-27.

Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. 1992. The balanced scorecard: measures that drive performance.

Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. 1996a. Linking the balanced scorecard to strategy. California management review, 39(1), 53-79.

Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. 1996b. Strategic learning & the balanced scorecard. Strategy & Leadership, 24(5), 18-24.

Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. 2001. Transforming the balanced scorecard from performance measurement to strategic management: Part I. Accounting horizons, 15(1), 87-104.

Serrano-Cinca, C., Fuertes-Callén, Y., & Mar-Molinero, C. 2005. Measuring DEA efficiency in Internet companies. Decision Support Systems, 38(4), 557-573.

Ungar, M., Brown, M., Liebenberg, L., & Othman, R. 2007. Unique pathways to resilience across cultures. Adolescence, 42(166), 287.

Downloads

Published

2019-07-23

Issue

Section

Articles