Investigating the challenges and barriers of convergence between Iran and republic of Azerbaijan

Authors

  • Ali Fateminasab University of Tehran

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24200/jsshr.vol2iss01pp51-57

Abstract

Azerbaijan republic is considered as geopolitical depth of Islamic republic of Iran. This republic has some common features with Iran. These convergence and common characteristics have the capability of both opportunity and threat. Methodology: The factors as coreligionist and the same race with Azeri tribe of Iran and also Azeri sects, common frontiers, common history and culture are common between Iran and Azerbaijan. Due to mismanagement of these common features, it becomes a threat. Results: So four mentioned factors cause the challenges in relationship between two countries. For example, common frontiers caused that the Iran enemies as U.S.A and Israel deploy in Iran north frontier. Conclusion: This study was done as descriptive and analytical and investigating the barriers and challenges between Iran and Azerbaijan republic. 

References

Amirahmadian, B. 2005. The relationship between Iran and Republic Azerbaijan-Tehran, ministry of foreign affairs.

Amirahmadian, B. 2008. Political atmosphere of Azerbaijan Republic. Quarterly periodical of regional studies of Islamic world, 35.

Barzgar, K. 2004. Identifying the effective elements in foreign political behavior of Iran and Azerbaijan in relation to eaehother, Coalition of articles of the 11th international Convention of central Asia and Caucasia.

Hafeznia, M. R. 2002. political geography of Iran, Tehran, Samt.

Jafari,A. & Bahmani, N. 2010. Coastal governments approach and legal regime of Caspian Sea, quarterly periodical of political Science, 13(52).

Javadi, A. & Rezazadeh, M.J. 2011. Knowing damages of Islamic Republic of Iran situations in relation to legal regime of Caspian Sea in regard to structure quarter Periodical of politic, 41(2).

Kazemi, A. 2006. Pan Turkism and pan Azerism, Tehran, Moaser Abrar.

Krashen, S. 1989. We acquire vocabulary and spelling by reading: Additional evidence for the input hypothesis. The Modern Language Journal, 73, 440-464.

Laufer, B. 2003. Vocabulary acquisition in a second language: Do learners really acquire most vocabulary by reading some empirical evidence. The Canadian Modern Language Review. 59 (4), 567-587.

Nassaji, H. 2003. L2 vocabulary learning from context: Strategies, knowledge sources, and their relationship with success in L2 lexical inferencing. TESOL Quarterly, 37(4), 645–670.

Nassaji, H. 2006. The relationship between depth of vocabulary knowledge andL2 learners' lexical inferencing strategy use and success. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 16 (1), 107-134.

Tabibian, M. 1983. Political thought, Tehran. Comes publications.

Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. 2002. Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics. Malaysia: Pearson Education.

Shen, M. (2008). EFL learners‟ responses to extensive reading: Survey and Pedagogical implications. The Reading Matrix, 8, 111-123.

Downloads

Published

2019-07-23

Issue

Section

Articles