The effect of Frequency of Intensive vs. Extensive Reading of the Knowledge of Lexical Appropriate

Authors

  • Fahimeh Rahmati Kachomesghali MA in Teaching
  • A.A Khomeijani university of Tehran

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24200/jsshr.vol2iss01pp25-30

Abstract

This paper attempted to investigate the effect of frequency of intensive vs. extensive reading of the knowledge of lexical appropriate. Methodology: In order to address this issue, a quantitative study was conducted on 90 students in English language institute. After Nelson language proficiency test 60 participants were selected. Finally, they were divided into three groups; first group was named "control group", second group was "experimental group A", and the last one was "experimental group B". Then all groups received pretest of Vocabulary proficiency through both extensive and intensive reading, the third test was a post-test of Vocabulary proficiency of extensive and intensive reading, which were developed by the researcher. The data in this study were consisted of three sets of score which were obtained from administering three types of test, a language proficiency test pilot group, and English vocabulary proficiency pretest and posttest. The mean and standard deviation of the participants‟ scores estimated in order to make a homogenized sample of the participants whose score were one standard deviation above and below the mean. The items of the test analyzed through item analysis and the reliability of the test estimated through ANOVA. Results: As a result and according to the tests, there are differences between the scores of before treatment and after treatment of the students. So, it can say that there is significant difference between intensive and extensive reading and their effectiveness on the knowledge of lexical appropriate of Iranian intermediate EFL learners. Conclusion: It may add that both intensive and extensive reading can effectively improve the knowledge of lexical appropriate of Iranian intermediate EFL learners.  

References

Alinejad, Z. 2004. The effect of task-based reading activities and text-based reading activity on the Iranian EFL learners‟ reading comprehension. Tehran: IAUCTB.

Bell, T. 2001. Extensive reading: Speed and comprehension. The Reading Matrix, 1, 1-13.

Brown, R. 2000. Extensive reading in action. Studies in English Language and Literature, 41, 79–123.

Chen, C. N., Chen, S. C., Chen, S. E., & Wey, S. C. 2013. THE Effects of Extensive Reading via E-books on Tertiary

Cho, K., & Krashen, S. 1994. Acquisition of vocabulary from the Sweet Valley Kids series: Adult ESL acquisition. Journal of Reading, 37, 662–667.

Coady, J. 1997. L2 vocabulary through extensive reading. In Second language vocabulary acquisition, ed. J. Coady and T. Huckin, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Constantino, R., Lee, S.Y., Cho, K.S., & Krashen, S. 1997. Free voluntary reading as a predictor of TOEFL scores. Applied Language Learning 8, 111-118.

Cutler, A., & Norris, D. G. 1988. The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 113–121.

Day, R, R. & Bamford, J. 2004: Extensive Reading Activities For Teaching language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Day, R. R. & Bamford, J. 2002: Top Ten Principles For Teaching Extensive Reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 14 (2), 136-411.

Horst, M. 2005. Learning L2 vocabulary through extensive reading: A measurement study. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 61, 355-382.

http://www.tojet.net/articles/v12i2/12228.pdf

Krashen, S. 1989. We acquire vocabulary and spelling by reading: Additional evidence for the input hypothesis. The Modern Language Journal, 73, 440-464.

Laufer, B. 2003. Vocabulary acquisition in a second language: Do learners really acquire most vocabulary by reading some empirical evidence. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 59 (4), 567-587.

Nassaji, H. 2003. L2 vocabulary learning from context: Strategies, knowledge sources, and their relationship with success in L2 lexical inferencing. TESOL Quarterly, 37(4), 645–670.

Nassaji, H. 2006. The relationship between depth of vocabulary knowledge andL2 learners' lexical inferencing strategy use and success. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 16 (1), 107-134.

Nation, I. S. P. 1990. Teaching and learning vocabulary. Boston: Newbury.

Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. 2002. Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics. Malaysia: Pearson Education.

Shen, M. 2008. EFL learners‟ responses to extensive reading: Survey and Pedagogical implications. The Reading Matrix, 8, 111-123.

Downloads

Published

2019-07-23

Issue

Section

Articles