Investigating the Effects of Cognitive and Metacognitive Learning Strategies to Increase Student Motivation and Probation

Authors

  • Mahbobe Hojati Islamic Azad University of Khomeinishahr.
  • Fatemeh Rezaei Islamic Azad University of Khomeinishahr.
  • Mohammadreza Iravani Islamic Azad University of Khomeinishahr.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24200/jmas.vol2iss02pp75-81

Abstract

The method of this study is Semi-experimental research method boy and girl first academic semester of probation, Methodology: including 200 students, of whom 50 were selected using stratified random sampling. And Bagmarsh randomly into two control groups (n = 25 for each group) were divided. Results: Instruments included the Academic Motivation Scale Harter and the average score of students in the second semester of the 2013- 2014 school year. Conclusion: The results of the data using analysis of covariance showed that cognitive and metacognitive strategies training have a positive effect on students' motivation.

References

Baghani, M. & Dehghanineishabori. M. 2011. The impact of academic motivation, self-efficacy and academic achievement of students on study approaches; on cognitive science in the National Conference on education, Mashhad.

Bembenutty, H. 2008. Self- Regulation of Learning and Academic Delay of Grafication: Gender and Ethnic Difference among College students. Journal of advanced academics, 18 (4): 586-616.

Biabangard, I. 2005. Educational psychology. Tehran: editing for publication.

Bilere, R., & Showman, G. 1993. Psychology applied to teaching (7th ed) New York. Hounghton Mifflin.

Cacuco - Holgado, M. , Cuesta - vargas, A. , Moreno- morales, N., Labajos-manzanares, M., Baron- Lopez, F., & vega-Cuesta, M. 2013.The association between academic engagement and achievement in health sciences students. BMC medical education, 12 (1): 1-7.

Clark, M. & Schroth, C. 2010. Examining relationships between academic motivation and personality among college student, journal of learning and individual differences, 20, 19-24. Document Reproduction Service No. ED474302).

Jauregizar, J. 2010. Online self-assessment with feedback and metacognitive knowledge. Higher Education, 59, 243.

Kamkari, K., Kumarsi, F., & Shekarzadeh. S. 2010. Fresh ideas in education quarterly.

Karimighartamani, M. 2013. the impact of technology on learning strategies-learning education and education of children rocking and selfsacrificing passion of high school section of Isfahan, master's thesis, Islamic Azad University of Khomeinishahr.

Maleki, B. 2005. The impact of cognitive and Metacognitive strategies on increasing education and learn different course texts, New cognitive science, 7 (3): 50-42.

Malekian, F., Narimani, M., & Sahebjamei. S. 2010. The role of cognitive and Metacognitive strategies in the motivation of learner’s progress educational system based on the information and communication technology. Lesson planning, knowledge and research in the educational sciences, Islamic Azad University, khorasgan branch, 2: 25-38.

Tucker, C., Zayco, R., & Herman, C. 2002. Teacher and child variables as predictors of academic engagement among low- income Africa American children, Psychology in the School, 39(4): 477-88.

Downloads

Published

2019-07-03

Issue

Section

Articles