Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB) In Ministry of Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24200/jmas.vol2iss03pp37-42Abstract
Human force is the most valuable asset and property in an organization. Using material and non-material means, insight, discretion and scheme, the managers and leaders of organizations can create an impression in the human force that their job is meaningful, purposeful, challenging and rewarding. Methodology: Under this circumstance, the staffs tend to be creative and resourceful, not to overreact to stimuli and steer the organization towards accomplishing the objectives. This study tries to adopt a holistic view of aspects of organizational citizenship behavior in the ministry of education. Results: The aspects of organizational citizenship behavior according to Organ and Bateman are the philanthropy and altruism, magnanimity, respect, citizenship merits and virtues and sense of responsibility. In addition, it aims at examining development education, aspects and impacts and outcomes of organizational citizenship behavior in the ministry of education with spirituality and morality as well as suggests guidelines in accordance with personality, motivation, and perception. Conclusion: Unofficial groups can affect the attitude and behavior of individuals. Therefore, the managers should identify the favorable unofficial groups and encourage the staffs to participate in them.References
Appelbaum, S., Bartolomucci, N., Beaumier, E., Boulanger, J., Corrigan, R., Dore, I., Serroni, C., 2004. Organizational citizenship behavior: a case study of culture, leadership and trust. Management decision, 42(1), 13-40.
Bienstock, C. C., DeMoranville, C. W., Smith, R. K., 2003. Organizational citizenship behavior and service quality. journal of services marketing, 17(4), 357-378.
Castro, C., Martín Armario, E., Martín Ruiz, D., 2004. The influence of employee organizational citizenship behavior on customer loyalty. International journal of Service industry management, 15(1), 27-53.
Cohen, A., Kol, Y., 2004. Professionalism and organizational citizenship behavior an empirical examination among Israeli nurses, journal of managerial psychology 119(4), 55-69.
Graham, J. W., 1991. An essay on organizational citizenship behavior. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 4(4), 249-270.
Moghimi, M., 2006. Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Theory to Practice, Management Culture, 3(11), 21-34.
Niehoff, B. P., & Moorman, R. H., 1993. Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management journal, 36(3), 527-556.
Organ, D. W., 1988. Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington Books/DC Heath and Com.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., Bachrach, D. G., 2000. Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical andempirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 6(3), 513-563.
Sanubari, M., 2009. Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Police Human Development. 5(16), 10-16.
Smith, C. A., Organ, D. W., Near, J. P., 1983. Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of applied psychology, 68(4), 653.
Van Dyne, L., Cummings, L.L. & Parks, J.M. (1995). "Extra-role Behaviors: InPursuit of Construct and Definitional Clarity (A Bridge Over Muddied Waters)”, In L. Zare, H. 2005. The role of Organizational Citizenship Behavior in Organizational Performance, Management Culture, 3(2), 87-106.
