Influence of the orientation of organizational learning on the management of customer relationship and the function of tile and ceramics companies in Yazd Province
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24200/jmas.vol3iss03pp43-50Abstract
The key purpose of this essay is to investigate and scrutinize the relationship between influence of orientation of organizational learning on customer relationship management and scrutinization of the function and the possible relations between these three factors among the tile and ceramics companies in Yazd province. Methodology: In order to measure the various aspects of these factors a 27-item questionnaire based on the likert5-point scale is being used. In the time of research, the statistical universe of the research consists of forty (40) companies. In order to determine the sample volume Morgan table was used. Based on this table the sample volume which was under study was determined as forty (40) companies. The research questionnaires were being responded by the high-ranked managers of each company. Results: To scrutinize the pivotal indices and the scatteredness of the research variables and in order to analyse the research data and hypotheses the structural equations modelling based on PLS method (partial least square method) has been used. Conclusion: After scrutinization and analysis of the research hypotheses the existence of a meaningful and positive relationship among them all in all was approved; that is the influence of the orientation of organizational learning on customer relationship management is positive and meaningful.References
Alegra, J., & Chiva, R. 2008. Assessing the impact of organizational learning capability on product innovation performance: an empirical test. Technovation, 286, 315-326.
Boulding, W., Staelin, R., Ehret, M., & Johnston, W. 2005. A customer relationship management roadmap: what is known, potential pitfalls, and where to go. Marketing 694, 155-166.
Butoor, M., 2013. Can organisational learning foster customer relationships? impelication for performance.learning organization, 20(4/5), 279-290.
Calantone, R., Cavusgil, S. T., & Zhao, Y. 2002. Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 316, 515-524.
Calisir, F., Altin Gumussoy, C., & Guzelsoy, E. 2013. Impacts of learning orientation on product innovation performance. The Learning Organization, 20(3), 176-194
Chang, H. H., & Ku, P. W. 2009. Implementation of relationship quality for CRM performance:acquisition of BPR and organisational learning. Total Quality Management, 203, 327-348.
Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. 1963. A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 2(4), 169-187
Dickson, P. 1996. The static and dynamic mechanics of competition: a comment on Hunt and Morgan’s comparative advantage theory. Marketing, 604, 102-106.
Galbreath, J., & Rogers, T. 1999. Customer relationship leadership: a leadership and motivation model for the twenty-first century business. The TQM magazine, 11(3), 161-171.
Goch, S. C., Elliott, C., & Quon, T. K. 2012. The relationship between learning capability and organizational performance: a meta-analytic examination. The Learning Organization, 192, 92-108.
Jayachandran, S., Sharma, S., Kaufman, P., & Raman, P. 2005. The role of relational information processes and technology use in customer relationship management. Marketing, 694, 177-192.
Jolly, D. R., & Thérin, F. 2007. New venture technology sourcing: exploring the effect of absorptive capacity, learning attitude and past performance. Innovation, 9(3-4), 235-248.
Kalakota, R., & Robinson, M. 1999. Customer relationship management: Integrating processes to build relationships. E-Business: Roadmap for Success, 109-135.
Lee, T., & Tsai, H. 2005. The effects of business operation mode on market orientation,learning orientation and innovativeness. Industrial Management&Data Systems, 105(3/4), 325-348.
Lemon, K., White, T., & Winer, R. 2002. Dynamic customer relationship management:Incorporating future considerations into the service retention decision. Marketing, 661, 1-14.
Marquardt, M. J. 2002. Building the Learning Organization: Mastering the Five Elements for Corporate Learning. Palo Alto: Davies-Black Press.
Ngai, E. W. T. 2005. an academic literature review and Classification, Marketing Intelligence & Planning. Customer relationship management research (1992-2002), 236(582-605).
Nordtvedt, L. P. 2005. Organizational learning from international business affiliations: Effects of the effective and efficient transfer of knowledge on firm performance. The University of Memphis.
Phang, C. W., kankanhalli, Atreyi and Ang, caizuan. 2008. Investigating organizational learning in e-Goverment projects: A multi-theoretic approach. strategic Information systems, 17, 99-123.
Qawasmeh, F. M., & Al-Omari, Z. S. 2013. The Learning Organization Dimensions and Their Impact on Organizational Performance: Orange Jordan as a Case Study. Arab Economic and Business Journal, 8(1-2), 38-52.
Reinartz, W., Krafft, M., & Hoyer, W. 2004. The customer relationship management process: its measurement and impact on performance. Marketing Research, 413, 293-305.
Sinkula, J., Baker, W., & Noordewier, T. 1997. A framework for market-based organizational learning: linking values, knowledge, and behavior. Marketing Science, 254, 305-318.
Skyrme, D. 1996. The learning organisation. Management Insight, 3.
Slater, S., & Narver, J. 1995. Market orientation and the learning organization. Marketing, 593, 63-74.
Szulanski, G. 1996. Exploring internal stickiness: impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 27-43.
Usaahawanitchakit, P. 2011. Strategic leadership, organizational learning, organizational innovation, and performance: evidence from electronics businesses in Thailand. Journal of Academy of Business and Economics, 112, 1-12.
Venkatraman, N. a. R., V. 1986. Measurement of business performance in strategy research: A comparison of approaches. Academy of management Review, 14, 801-808.
Zeynep Ata, U., & Toker, A. 2012. The effect of customer relationship management adoption in business-to-business markets. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 27(6), 497-507.
