Intervention of third party in proceedings of Iran and France law

Authors

  • Mohammad Reza Marandi Islamic Azad University, Garmi Branch
  • Sara Mohammadi Islamic Azad University, Garmi Branch,

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24200/jsshr.vol5iss01pp1-4

Abstract

Third party objection is a strategy which prevents the violation of rights of third parties. The only place where there are laws about the third parties’ objection is Articles 417 to 425 of the law of rules of procedure in civil matters. Methodology: In Article 417 of the law, the terms of third-party objection are listed and subsequent legislator in Article 418 of the Civil Procedure Law has predicted the possibility of third-party objection against the arbiter decision that in some ways has specific criteria. Results: In accordance with this provision, "about the previous article, third party has the right to object to any rendered judgment from the General, revolution and appeal court and to the arbiter award, those who self or their representative are not involved in the determination of arbiter can object as a third party". And law enforcement in Articles 146 and 147 has discussed third party objection. Conclusion: In French law, pursuant to Article 584 of the new Code of Civil Procedure of France in the case that the parties of vote objected a lot and the vote is not degradable, third party objection can be accepted if all parties of dispute to be in side of objection dispute.

References

Bahrami, B. 2002. execution of civil judgments, Tehran, Negah Bine publishing.

Bazgir, Y. 2001. formalities of procedure in the Supreme Court, Mashhad, Ferdowsi Press.

Charney, J. I. 1998. Third party dispute settlement and international law. Colum. J. Transnat'l L., 36, 65.

Gharavi, H. G. 1999. The 1997 Iranian International Commercial Arbitration Law: The UNCITRAL Model Law à L'Iranienne. Arbitration International, 15(1), 85-96.

Guillaume, G. 2011. The use of precedent by international judges and arbitrators. Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 2(1), 5-23.

Hanessian, G. 1988. General Principles of Law in the Iran-US Claims Tribunal. Colum. J. Transnat'l L., 27, 309.

Jafarian, M., & Rezaeian, M. 1998. The New Law on International Commercial Arbitration in Iran. Journal of International Arbitration, 15(3), 31-51.

Matin Daftary, A. 2002 a. civil procedure and commercial, two-volume periods, Volume II, First Edition, Majd Publications

Matin Daftary, A. 2002 b. a collection of judicial precedent (legal part), Tehran, Raham publishing

Reisman, W. M. 1980. Termination of the USSR’s Treaty Right of Intervention in Iran. American Journal of International Law, 74(1), 144-154.

Shams, A. 2012. Civil Procedure, Volume III, Tehran, Derak publishing

Stefanie, G., Lavasur, G., & Blok, B. 1998. the Criminal Procedure Code, Volume I, translator, Hasan Dadban, Tehran, Allameh Tabatabai University Press.

Downloads

Published

2019-08-15

Issue

Section

Articles