Bank Letters of Guarantee’s Impact on Domestic and International Banking Procedure

Authors

  • Akram Yousefian Zadeh Abarkouh Branch, Islamic Azad University
  • Shokouh Namdar Taft Branch, Islamic Azad University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24200/jsshr.vol4iss02pp42-49

Abstract

Bank Letters of guarantee are one of important instruments in domestic and international business intercourses in order to guarantee commitments of contract parties or customers, whereby the bank guarantee to pay a certain amount of cash in case of reversal or not fulfilling the contract, on behalf of guarantee applicant, based on the request against beneficiary. Methodology: Regarding to the volume and extensiveness of current business transactions and letters of guarantee’s functions, commitments guarantees, which are subject to letters of guarantee can’t be perfectly phrased as contract guarantees in civil law, and it seems they are private contracts that are examined in article 10 of civil law. Results: Letters of guarantee’s principle of independence is noticed as most important characteristic of this instrument and it pays the cash without considering the base contract between parties. Letters of guarantee’s many primary traits, including the principle of independence, are accepted based on uniform regulations of warrant letters named as URDG 758. Conclusion: As the central bank of the Islamic republic of Iran accepted these regulations, there are no differences in general framework of issuing domestic and international letters of guarantee, among Iranian banks. Warranties in tender or auction, verity of fulfilling commitments, prepayment and etc. are among regular and common letters of guarantee’s classifications.

References

Affaki, G., & Goode, R. M. 2011. Guide to ICC Uniform Rules for Demand Guarantees URDG 758. International Chamber of Commerce.

Barru, D. J. 2005. How to Guarantee Contractor Performance on International Construction Projects: Comparing Surety Bonds with Bank Guarantees and Standby Letters of Credit. Geo. Wash. Int'l L. Rev., 37, 51.

Buckley, R. P., & Gao, X. 2002. Development of the fraud rule in letter of credit law: The journey so far and the road ahead. U. Pa. J. Int'l Econ. L., 23, 663.

De Lx, F. 1999. The UN Convention on Independent Guarantees and Stand-by Letters of Credit. In Int'l L. (Vol. 33, p. 831).

Gao, X. 2010. The Fraud Rule under the UN Convention on Independent Guarantees and Standby Letters of Credit: A Significant Contribution from an International Perspective. Geo. Mason J. Int'l Com. L., 1, 48.

Kelly-Louw, M. 2009. Illegality as an exception to the autonomy principle of bank demand guarantees. Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa, 42(3), 339-386.

Kelly-Louw, M. 2009. The documentary nature of demand guarantees and the doctrine of strict compliance (part 1). SA Mercantile Law Journal= SA Tydskrif vir Handelsreg, 21(3), 306-321.

Kim, S. M. 2015. The Supreme Court of Korea’s Decisions on the Fraud Exception in a Demand Guarantee. Journal of Korea Trade, 19(3), 41-58.

Maurovic, L. 1999. Standby Letter of Credit-Bank Guarantee in the Form of Letter of Credit-New Rules. Zb. Prav. Fak. Sveuc. Rij., 20, 641.

McLaughlin, G. T. 1992. Standby Letters of Credit and Guaranties: An Exercise in Cartography. Wm. & Mary L. Rev., 34, 1139.

Neilsen, J., & Nielsen, N. 2001. Standby Letters of Credit and the ISP 98: A European Perspective. Banking and Finance Law Review, 16(2), 163-230.

Nielsen, J., & Nielsen, N. 2013. The German Bank Guarantee: Lesson to Be Drawn for China. Geo. Mason J. Int'l Com. L., 5, 171

Downloads

Published

2019-08-14

Issue

Section

Articles