Philosophical analysis of theory x and y

Karamolla Daneshfard, Samira Soheili Rad

Abstract


The historical context management can be examined, such as the Pyramids of Egypt management, control and communication practices in the ancient Roman Empire and the legal framework of trade in the fourteenth century Venice followed. Methodology: Nevertheless, Iranians, Chinese, German and some other relatives insights and attitudes of the past have chosen in this area, but major changes in management during the Industrial Revolution came expecting. The world in the seventeenth century, the era of social upheaval when the thirteen American colonies broke away from Britain and the United States formed the crucial transformations spent. In this period of rapid population growth created fairs and supply of consumer goods.  Results: The It was during this period that extends mass production methods Adam Smith (based on the division of labor and specialization in the pin factory) industry took a big turn in such a way that its effects are still seen in how often business organizations be. For example, Henry Ford in the early twentieth century by mass production in automotive manufacturing were achieved legendary success.  Conclusion: Although this effect is limited to the amount of released McGregor at the time of his life, but he still is important. His classic study on the topic and motivated work, reflecting his main concern in the mid and late 1960s, when the one-dimensional organizations were at the peak. Public criticism of the theory of X and Y is that they are very exclusive.

 


Full Text:

PDF

References


Arani Officer, MR. 2013. Development Management, the publisher.

Babylon, Z. 2012. Comparison of areas of change and innovation in management styles x and y. Master's thesis. Shahid Beheshti University.

Bartol, K. & Martin, D. 2010. Management; 2nd ed., New York: Mc Graw- Hill, Inc.

Bazargan, Z. 2009. new approaches to educational management. Journal of Psychology and Educational Sciences. Year 33.

Beer, M. 2013 Organizational change of Development. A System View, Glen View, III: Scott, Foresman.

Chester, B. 2012. The Functions of the Executive; Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

Drucker, P. 2008. The Practice of Management; New York: Harper and Brothers.

Garvin, D. 2007. "Building a Learning Organization", Harvard Business Review.

Hersey, P. & Blanchard, K. 2010. Organizational Behavior Management. Translated by Ali Interests Section. Third edition. Tehran.

Katz, D. & Robert L, K. 2006. The Social Psychology of Organizations; 2 nd, New York: John Willey and Sons.

Kreitner, R. 2014. Management; 7th ed Boston: Houghton Co.

Maslow, A. 1954. Motivation and Personality, New York: Itarper of Row.

Rein hard, B. 2013. "Bureaucracy", International Encyclopedia of the social Sciences. 2, Macmillan and the Freepress, New Yourk.

Stalker, B .2011. The Management of Information; London: Travistock.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24200/jmas.vol7iss02pp44-48

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.