Analysis of Supply Response and Price Risk on Rice Production in Nigeria

Authors

  • Ayinde Oetgy University of Ilorin, Ilorin Nigeria
  • Oni Frec Erdw University of Ilorin, Ilorin Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24200/jmas.vol2iss04pp12-17

Abstract

Nigeria is among many African countries that have engaged in agricultural liberalization since 1986 in the hope that reforms emphasizing price incentives will encourage producers to respond. Hitherto, the reforms seem to have introduced greater uncertainty into the market given increasing rates of price volatility. Methodology: This study, therefore, models supply responses in Nigerian Rice production that include the standard arguments as well as price risk. Statistical information on domestic and imported quantities of rice was obtained for 41 years (1970 to 2011) from the AGROSTAT system of the statistical division of the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), Federal Ministry of Agriculture statistical bulletins, Central Bank of Nigeria statistical bulletins and National Bureau of Statistic. (NBS). Results: The data are analyzed using descriptive, equilibrium output supply function and co-integration models and vector autoregressive distributed lag. Rice importation showed a negative sign and was statistically significant with changes in output also responsive to changes in price. Conclusion: The results indicate that producers are more responsive not only to price and non-price factor but to price risk and exchange rate. It is therefore imperative to reduce price risk as to increase the response of producer to supply by bridging the gap in production.

References

Akanni, K.A. and Okeowo, T.A., 2011 Analysis of Aggregate output supply Response of selected Food Grains in Nigeria. Journal of Stored Products and Post Harvest Research, 2 14: 266 – 278

Anderson, H. and Huirne, 1997. Coping CAB International Oxon United Kingdom ISBN 085199 199X

Anonymous, 2008. Jambi dalamAngka.BadanPerencanaandan Pembangunan Daerah

Darmawi, H., 2005. ManajemenRisiko. Penerbit Bumi Aksara. Jakarta.

Holt, M. T. & Aradhyula, S. V., 1990. Price Risk in Supply Equations: An Application of GARCH Time-Series Models to the US Broiler Market. Southern Economic Journal, 571.

Kerney, R. and Hertel T.W., 2008.Yield Response to Prices: Implications for Policy

Nerlove, M. and Bachman, K.L., 1960.The analysis of changes in Agricultural Supply.Problems and Approaches.Journal of Farm Economics 42: 531 -554.

Rahji M.A.Y., Adewunmi M.O., 2008: “Market Supply Response and Demand for Local Rice in Nigeria: Implications for Self-Sufficiency Policy”. J. Cent. Eur. Agric., 93: 567-574

Rezitis, A. N., & Stavropoulos, K. S., 2009. Modeling pork supply response and price volatility: the case of Greece. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 411, 145-162.

Saka, J.O., Okoruwa, V.O., Lawal, B.O. And Ajijola, S., 2005 “Adoption of Improve Rice Varieties Among Small Holder Farmers in South Western Nigeria”. World Journal of Agricultural Science 1:42-49

Shideed, K. H., & White, F. C., 1989. Alternative forms of price expectations in supply analysis for US corn and soybean acreages. Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, 14(1836-2016-150808), 281.

Subervie, J., 2008. The variable response of agricultural supply to world price instability in developing countries. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 591, 72-92.

Downloads

Published

2019-07-03

Issue

Section

Articles